@article{ref1,
title="GRADE system in systematic reviews of prevalence or incidence studies evaluating sport-related injuries: why is GRADE important?",
journal="British journal of sports medicine",
year="2024",
author="Martinez-Calderon, Javier and García-Muñoz, Cristina",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="Epidemiological systematic reviews are increasing in the field of sport and exercise medicine (SEM). For example, the prevalence or incidence rates of lower extremity (eg, knee), upper extremity (eg, hands), and head and neck injuries have been synthetised in different types of sports (eg, basketball).1-4 The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system is a rigorous and transparent approach that allows researchers to rate the certainty of evidence based on analysis of the risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision and publication bias.5 Although there are other approaches apart from GRADE to rate this certainty,6 GRADE is considered the gold standard for this purpose.   GRADE was primarily designed to rate the certainty of evidence from clinical trials, but the GRADE Working Group also stated that this system can be used in observational studies.5 Specific guidelines have been developed for rating the evidence from prognostic factors7 and diagnostic accuracy.8 However, there is currently no available guideline for rating the evidence from epidemiological studies. The GRADE Working Group proposes randomised clinical trials begin with high evidence and can be downgraded by up to three levels (moderate, low or very-low evidence) depending on the presence of serious (−1 level) or very serious (−2 levels) risk of bias, …<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0306-3674",
doi="10.1136/bjsports-2023-107788",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2023-107788"
}