@article{ref1,
title="Management of traumatic brain injury: practical development of a recent proposal - Response",
journal="Clinical medicine (London, England)",
year="2022",
author="Li, Lucia M. and Dilley, Michael D. and Carson, Alan and Twelftree, Jaq and Hutchinson, Peter J. and Belli, Antonio and Betteridge, Shai and Cooper, Paul N. and Griffin, Colette M. and Jenkins, Peter O. and Liu, Clarence and Sharp, David J. and Sylvester, Richard and Wilson, Mark H. and Turner, Martha S. and Greenwood, Richard",
volume="22",
number="4",
pages="358-359",
abstract="We thank our rehabilitation medicine colleagues for their comments on our article, which illustrate how strongly all healthcare professionals involved in the care of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) feel about the urgent need to improve clinical services.1, 2 TBI patients desperately require a pathway that delivers effective, personalised acute and chronic care, and we would like to emphasise that our pathway does not propose replacing rehabilitation physicians and facilities. Rather, we view rehabilitation services as a crucial part of any TBI pathway, and rehabilitation is a highly suitable background form which to recruit leaders of specialist TBI teams.   We entirely agree with Wade that effective rehabilitation is a person-centred process, which depends on an expert multidisciplinary team, working collaboratively within a framework and care pathway derived from the biopsychosocial model of illness towards agreed goals, with treatment appropriate to the individual patient's needs.3 However, any model of rehabilitation must:   be underpinned by correct neuroscientifically-based diagnoses   be accessible to those that need it.   A robust, structured care pathway does not currently exist for most patients with TBI. This deficit is, in our view, not solely resource-related. It is also down to lack of specific training and, thus, expertise in the neuroscientific diagnostics, clinical management and specialist rehabilitation needed by these patients. Conditions with comparable health and societal impact, such as heart attacks or stroke, all have specialist pathways that are highly effective. In contrast, vast numbers of TBI patients never get to see anyone with specialist knowledge in TBI and miss out on multidisciplinary input that is needed to treat the wide range of complex post-traumatic problems that often arise. This is especially the case for those with milder TBIs who present to smaller hospitals or general practitioners. This is why we proposed a structured pathway to deliver specialist, multidisciplinary care to TBI patients from their presentation to healthcare services through to the management of any long-term conditions. A structured pathway also helps to avoid patients being 'lost in the system', promotes service evaluation and supports much-needed research. ....<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1470-2118",
doi="10.7861/clinmed.resp.22.4",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.resp.22.4"
}