@article{ref1,
title="Ideological divarication in civil commitment decision-making",
journal="Psychiatry, psychology and law",
year="2003",
author="Freckelton, I.",
volume="10",
number="2",
pages="390-396",
abstract="The author argues that fundamental ideological divergence in civil commitment decision-making can be identified by reference to a series of specific points of reference: cases where patients have recently self-harmed, cases where patients have harmed others, personality disorder cases, bipolar affective disorder cases, eating disorder cases and comorbidity cases. He contends that the classification of decision-making at such points as &quot;paternalist&quot; or &quot;civil libertarian&quot; is simplistic but, nonetheless, has a utility in identifying fundamental orientations on the part of clinical and review body decision-makers as well as for facilitating self-aware evaluation of decision-maker temptations and biases. © 2003 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1321-8719",
doi="10.1375/pplt.2003.10.2.390",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/pplt.2003.10.2.390"
}