@article{ref1,
title="Effect of active vs. passive recovery on repeat suicide run time",
journal="Journal of strength and conditioning research",
year="2003",
author="Graham, James E. and Douglas Boatwright, J. and Hunskor, Martha J. and Howell, Dan C.",
volume="17",
number="2",
pages="338-341",
abstract="This study was conducted to evaluate the difference between active and passive recovery methods during successive suicide runs by Division I women's collegiate basketball athletes (n = 14). Testing consisted of sprinting suicides on the basketball court using both traditional (short) and reverse-sequence (long) protocols. Two 90-second recovery methods were used, passive (standing still) and active (slow self-paced jogging). Although successive run time was reduced by a mean of 0.55 seconds after passive recovery relative to active, it did not reach significance (p = 0.09). Likewise, the difference between long and short line versions was nonsignificant (p = 0.41). Therefore, neither line sequence nor 90-second recovery technique appears to influence subsequent run time when performing 2 maximal-effort suicides.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1064-8011",
doi="10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0338:eoavpr>2.0.co;2",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0338:eoavpr>2.0.co;2"
}