@article{ref1,
title="Evaluation of risk by patients' and with clinicians' ratings: a CORE-OM and CORE-A investigation",
journal="Clinical psychology and psychotherapy",
year="2011",
author="Bedford, Alan and Lukic, Goran and Tibbles, Jennifer",
volume="18",
number="3",
pages="244-249",
abstract="While Whewell and Bonanno reported significant relationships between therapists' ratings of risk and patients' ratings of categorized Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measures (CORE-OM) risk items, Rowsell and Stennett-Cox found that only two non-risk items of the total 34 CORE-OM items correlated significantly with reported risk behaviours. The current study of 870 patients examined the intercorrelations of the CORE-OM item matrix, including the 28 non-risk items, and their correlations with the Risk domain items. Additionally, CORE-Assessment clinicians' risk ratings were compared with the patients' risk self-ratings. The results differed from the findings of Rowsell and Stennett-Cox and provided validatory evidence supplementing that of Whewell and Bonanno. The Harm to Self items appeared to be of particular behavioural significance.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1063-3995",
doi="10.1002/cpp.714",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.714"
}