@article{ref1,
title="Correction: Effectiveness of a school-based Life Gatekeeper Training Program on suicide prevention in China: protocol for a randomized controlled trial",
journal="Trials",
year="2024",
author="Qu, Diyang and Zhang, Xuan and Liu, Dongyu and Liu, Bowen and Chen, Dongyang and Cai, Chengxi and An, Jing and Saxena, Shekhar and Chen, Runsen",
volume="25",
number="1",
pages="e472-e472",
abstract="Correction: Trials 25, 335 (2024)  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08137-2  Following the publication of the original article [1], we were notified that a typo was identified in the methods section. In the description of the literacy of suicide scale, it was stated that &quot;The LOSS is a 12-item scale covering a series of statements about suicidal behaviors and suicidal individuals.&quot; The number 12 was a typo as the LOSS actually contained 11 items. This 11-item version is a result of a removal of the item &quot;Men are more likely to commit suicide than women&quot; from the 12-item scale due to inconsistent reporting of gender-specific suicide rates in China, as indicated in Han et al. (2017). Therefore, the correct description should be &quot;The LOSS is a 11-item scale covering a series of statements about suicidal behaviors and suicidal individuals.&quot;  This typo does not affect any other part of the protocol or the RCT itself, as the existing citation of Han et al. (2017) and the application of the 11-item version of LOSS are correct.   The original article was corrected.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1745-6215",
doi="10.1186/s13063-024-08322-3",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08322-3"
}