@article{ref1, title="Toward a new framework for understanding human-wild animal relations", journal="American behavioral scientist", year="2019", author="Waldhorn, Daniela R.", volume="63", number="8", pages="1080-1100", abstract="Most animals live in the wild and a majority probably have lives of net suffering. An increasing number of ethicists argue that humans have a duty to help them. Nevertheless, people's attitudes and perceptions toward wild animal suffering have rarely been studied. Psychology has traditionally framed the analysis of human-wild animal relations within environmental psychology, conceptualizing wild animals as merely one further component of nature. Though this approach is suitable for environmental and conservation purposes, I argue that it fails to track our attitudes toward animals as individuals with a well-being of their own. I use Kellert's framework about factors affecting attitudes toward wildlife to review and integrate existing findings in social psychology. I also suggest how other factors merit further investigation. Finally, I defend that the study of human-wild animal relations is a suitable topic of psychosocial research independently of other anthropocentric or conservationist purposes.

Language: en

", language="en", issn="0002-7642", doi="10.1177/0002764219830465", url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764219830465" }