TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2009//
TI  - Lessons from the Campaign against Elsevier “We won, but how did we win?”
JO  - ACME : an international e-journal for critical geographies
A1  - Stafford, Tom
SP  - 494
EP  - 504
VL  - 8
IS  - 3
N2  - Elsevier is one of the world's leading academic and medical publishers. Reed Exhibitions is an international business specialising in organising trade and consumer events. On their books are nine of the world's major arms fairs. The connection between the two companies is their parent company, Reed Elsevier. Through Reed Elsevier two global industries are brought into contact: the world community of academics, medical and education professionals who write, review, edit and purchase Elsevier's books and journals; and the international trade in arms and torture equipment, the network which supports war and oppressive regimes while fuelling conflict, human rights abuses and underdevelopment across the world.    Reed Elsevier withdrew their involvement in the arms exhibitions business due to a campaign by academics and medics between 2005 and 2007. This article reviews the history and strategy of the campaign from my perspective as an academic and someone who was involved in the campaign from the beginning. I identify factors which may have influenced decision makers at Reed Elsevier, situational factors which assisted the campaign, and strategic choices made by the campaigners. I suggest that this last category may offer some general lessons for successful campaigning against corporations. Specifically these were, first, having a persistent core of individuals and groups who actively pursued the campaign; second, taking advantage of the strong interconnections within and between academic and medical networks; third, that the global reach of Elsevier created a global and diverse community of stakeholders who could lay claim to an interest in the corporation's actions. I conclude optimistically by affirming the value of small victories against corporations.<p />
LA  - 
SN  - 1492-9732
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/
ID  - ref1
ER  -