TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2000//
TI  - Distress and aggression during dating conflict: A test of the coercion hypothesis
JO  - Personal Relationships
A1  - Katz, Jennifer
A1  - Jones, Deborah J.
A1  - Beach, Steven R. H.
SP  - 391
EP  - 402
VL  - 7
IS  - 4
N2  - Research with clinically depressed and maritally discordant couples suggests that women's distressed behaviors function to suppress their partners' subsequent aggressive responses. We applied this coercion hypothesis to a nonclinical sample of dating couples (N = 288). We further examined whether these effects were gender-specific, and whether distressed and aggressive behaviors differ within physically violent versus nonviolent relationships. Women but not men reported engaging in elevated rates of distress in response to partner aggression during past dating conflicts. However, both women and men expected distressed behavior to suppress partner aggression during future conflicts. Expectations about the functional effects of distressed behavior did not differ for participants with physically violent partners versus nonviolent partners. However, participants in violent relationships reported enacting more distressed behaviors and had greater expectations for partner verbal aggression during future conflicts than did participants in nonviolent relationships. Future research may identify the early onset of dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples and concomitant psychological distress.<p /> 
LA  - 
SN  - 1350-4126
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00024.x
ID  - ref1
ER  -