TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2013//
TI  - Spinal sagittal contour affecting falls: Cut-off value of the lumbar spine for falls
JO  - Gait and posture
A1  - Ishikawa, Yoshinori
A1  - Miyakoshi, Naohisa
A1  - Kasukawa, Yuji
A1  - Hongo, Michio
A1  - Shimada, Yoichi
SP  - 260
EP  - 263
VL  - 38
IS  - 2
N2  - Spinal deformities reportedly affect postural instability or falls. To prevent falls in clinical settings, the determination of a cut-off angle of spinal sagittal contour associated with increase risk for falls would be useful for screening for high-risk fallers. The purpose of this study was to calculate the spinal sagittal contour angle associated with increased risk for falls during medical checkups in community dwelling elders. The subjects comprised 213 patients (57 men, 156 women) with a mean age of 70.1 years (range, 55-85 years). The upright and flexion/extension thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angles, and the spinal inclination were evaluated with SpinalMouse(®). Postural instability was evaluated by stabilometry, using the total track length (LNG), enveloped areas (ENV), and track lengths in the lateral and anteroposterior directions (X LNG and Y LNG, respectively). The back extensor strength (BES) was measured using a strain-gauge dynamometer. The relationships among the parameters were analyzed statistically. Age, lumbar lordosis, spinal inclination, LNG, X LNG, Y LNG, and BES were significantly associated with falls (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that lumbar lordosis was the most significant factor (P<0.01). Univariate logistic regression analyses for falls about lumbar lordosis angles revealed that angles of 3° and less were significant for falls. The present findings suggest that increased age, spinal inclination, LNG, X LNG, Y LNG, and decreased BES and lumbar lordosis, are associated with falls. An angle of lumbar lordosis of 3° or less was associated with falls in these community-dwelling elders.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 0966-6362
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.11.024
ID  - ref1
ER  -