TY - JOUR PY - 1983// TI - Visual cueing effectiveness: comparison of perception and flying performance JO - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society annual meeting A1 - Maio, Joe De A1 - Rinalducci, Edward J. A1 - Brooks, Rebecca A1 - Brunderman, John SP - 928 EP - 932 VL - 27 IS - 11 N2 - Growing emphasis on simulation of low altitude and air-to-air tactical scenarios has greatly increased the requirement for simulator visual systems capable of providing the pilot high-fidelity out-of-the-cockpit cues. Evaluation of visual system performance through simulator flying studies has been the primary measure of system quality. Such studies can be costly and time consuming, and often they provide equivocal results. The present set of experiments was conducted to investigate the use of psychophysical measurement methodology to provide a quick, low-cost evaluation of the altitude cueing effectiveness of simulator visual displays. Experiment I examined altitude perception in several visual environments. Experiment II was a validation effort, in which flying performance was evaluated in selected visual environments. In Experiment I pilots made altitude estimates based on static and dynamic presentations of visual displays containing texture and varying sizes of 3-dimensional objects. Best-fitting power functions were used to relate perceived altitude to actual altitude. In Experiment II Air force pilots flew the Advanced Simulator for Pilot Training F-16 through five selected visual environments at 600 kt and 150 ft AGL. Reliable difference were found as a function of display variables. In environments which provided strong altitude cues, pilots were able to fly very close to the designated altitude. In environments which provided poorer cues, pilots flew substantially above designated altitude.
Language: en
LA - en SN - 2169-5067 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193128302701112 ID - ref1 ER -