TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2013//
TI  - Occupation-based strategy training for adults with traumatic brain injury: A pilot study
JO  - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
A1  - Dawson, Deirdre R.
A1  - Binns, Malcolm
A1  - Hunt, Anne
A1  - Lemsky, Carolyn
A1  - Polatajko, Helene J.
SP  - 1959
EP  - 1963
VL  - 94
IS  - 10
N2  - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, prior to undertaking a larger trial, feasibility of the study processes to determine effectiveness of occupation-based strategy training for producing changes on trained real-world behaviours and to determine whether far transfer of training effects to measures of real-world impact, including participation in everyday life could be achieved. DESIGN: Partially randomized controlled trial with pre and post-intervention assessments done by assessors masked to the treatment arm. SETTING: Testing occurred at a research institute, interventions at participants' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen people with chronic traumatic brain injury, 7 in the experimental group (mean age 42.6 years, mean time post-TBI 9.8 years, 4 men,) and six in the control arm (mean age 40.5 years, mean time post-TBI 10.8 years, 3 men) were assessed immediately before and after the intervention phase. INTERVENTION: Occupation-based strategy training, an adapted version of the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP), was provided in two, one-hour sessions per week for 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX), Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory Participation Index (M2Pi), Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). RESULTS: The study processes (testing and intervention) were acceptable to all participants. Evidence of far transfer was found as the experimental group improved significantly more than the control group on performance and satisfaction with performance ratings on untrained goals (p<0.05) and reported increased levels of participation (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Findings must be interpreted with caution as the sample is small and comparisons are made with a no-treatment control. Nevertheless, they suggest that the training is feasible and a larger trial warranted.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 0003-9993
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.021
ID  - ref1
ER  -