TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2000//
TI  - A futher comment on the constuct validity of laboratory aggression paradigms: a response to Giancola and Chermack
JO  - Aggression and violent behavior
A1  - Tedeschi, James T.
A1  - Quigley, Brian M.
SP  - 127
EP  - 136
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
N2  - Giancola and Chermack responded to our criticisms of laboratory paradigms for studying aggression by arguing that two existing laboratory procedures circumvent the problems raised, and they provide evidence for the validity of these procedures. We argue that Giancola and Chermack do not succeed in their defense of existing paradigms for both conceptual and methodological reasons. (Abstract Adapted from Source: Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2000. Copyright © 2000 by Elsevier Science)    REFERENCES:  Giancola, P.R., & Chermack, S.T. (1998, Fall). Construct Validity of Laboratory Aggression Paradigms: A Response to Tedeschi and Quigley (1996). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3(3), 237-253. (VioLit Record Number 17438)    Construct Validity  Aggression Causes  Aggression Research  07-00<p />
LA  - en
SN  - 1359-1789
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/
ID  - ref1
ER  -