TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2014//
TI  - Methodological issues in defining aggression for content analyses of sexually explicit material
JO  - Archives of sexual behavior
A1  - McKee, Alan
SP  - 81
EP  - 87
VL  - 44
IS  - 1
N2  - There exists an important tradition of content analyses of aggression in sexually explicit material. The majority of these analyses use a definition of aggression that excludes consent. This article identifies three problems with this approach. First, it does not distinguish between aggression and some positive acts. Second, it excludes a key element of healthy sexuality. Third, it can lead to heteronormative definitions of healthy sexuality. It would be better to use a definition of aggression such as Baron and Richardson's (1994) in our content analyses, that includes a consideration of consent. A number of difficulties have been identified with attending to consent but this article offers solutions to each of these.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 0004-0002
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0253-3
ID  - ref1
ER  -