TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2004//
TI  - Illusory motion reversal is caused by rivalry, not by perceptual snapshots of the visual field
JO  - Vision research
A1  - Eagleman, David M.
A1  - Holcombe, Alex O.
A1  - Kline, Keith
SP  - 2653
EP  - 2658
VL  - 44
IS  - 23
N2  - In stroboscopic conditions--such as motion pictures--rotating objects may appear to rotate in the reverse direction due to under-sampling (aliasing). A seemingly similar phenomenon occurs in constant sunlight, which has been taken as evidence that the visual system processes discrete "snapshots" of the outside world. But if snapshots are indeed taken of the visual field, then when a rotating drum appears to transiently reverse direction, its mirror image should always appeared to reverse direction simultaneously. Contrary to this hypothesis, we found that when observers watched a rotating drum and its mirror image, almost all illusory motion reversals occurred for only one image at a time. This result indicates that the motion reversal illusion cannot be explained by snapshots of the visual field. The same result is found when the two images are presented within one visual hemifield, further ruling out the possibility that discrete sampling of the visual field occurs separately in each hemisphere. The frequency distribution of illusory reversal durations approximates a gamma distribution, suggesting perceptual rivalry as a better explanation for illusory motion reversal. After adaptation of motion detectors coding for the correct direction, the activity of motion-sensitive neurons coding for motion in the reverse direction may intermittently become dominant and drive the perception of motion.
LA  - 
SN  - 0042-6989
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.030
ID  - ref1
ER  -