TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2014//
TI  - Counterintuitive expert psychological evidence in child sexual abuse trials in New Zealand
JO  - Psychiatry, psychology and law
A1  - Seymour, Fred
A1  - Blackwell, Suzanne
A1  - Calvert, Sarah
A1  - McLean, Briar
SP  - 511
EP  - 522
VL  - 21
IS  - 4
N2  - The Evidence Act 2006 came into law in New Zealand in 2007. Among the many reforms was an amendment to the law pertaining to expert opinion evidence. In keeping with other jurisdictions, New Zealand adopted the "substantial helpfulness" test in relation to the admissibility of expert evidence. Since 2008, the courts have regularly admitted what has been termed "counterintuitive" expert psychological evidence in child sexual abuse trials, and appellate courts have upheld the use of this evidence. Such evidence has the purpose of educating juries, with particular reference to commonly held misconceptions about child sexual abuse. We discuss what is meant by the term counterintuitive evidence, why such evidence has been deemed helpful and the types of counterintuitive evidence currently given by psychologist expert witnesses in the New Zealand courts.<p />
LA  - en
SN  - 1321-8719
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2013.839930
ID  - ref1
ER  -