TY - JOUR
PY - 2015//
TI - Outcomes after long-term follow-up for combat-related extremity injuries in a multidisciplinary limb salvage clinic
JO - Annals of vascular surgery
A1 - Casey, Kevin
A1 - Demers, Pamela
A1 - Deben, Sophia
A1 - Nelles, Meghann E.
A1 - Weiss, Jeffrey S.
SP - 496
EP - 501
VL - 29
IS - 3
N2 - BACKGROUND: While the incidence of casualties from the Global War on Terror is decreasing, there remains a focus on the long-term sequelae from injuries sustained in combat. Patients with prior significant limb injuries remain at risk for future complications. This study examines our institution's experience with a multidisciplinary team approach toward this challenging patient population.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all patients treated in a single institution Limb Preservation Clinic over a two-year period. Those patients who sustained a combat-related injury in theater were examined. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, amputation rates, time to amputation, and reasons for failure were examined.
RESULTS: Niney-four patients were evaluated in our multidisciplinary Limb Preservation Clinic over a two-year period. 20 patients (21%) were seen for combat-related injuries. Sixteen patients were evaluated and treated for chronic complications at a median of 13 months from their injury. All 16 patients were male with a median age of 24 years (range, 20-35). Ten patients sustained injuries secondary to a dismounted improvised explosive device (IED). All 16 patients had extensive soft tissue injuries and associated fractures. Only 2 patients sustained a vascular injury. The median number of prior surgeries to the affected limb was 8 (range, 3-19). The limb salvage rate of 37% was lower than our non-combat cohort (47%). The most common reasons for delayed amputation included chronic pain, osteomyelitis, and soft tissue infections.
CONCLUSION: The high secondary amputation rates seen in this cohort underscores the need for long-term follow-up. Despite successful initial outcomes, many patients eventually progress to limb loss. Patients who sustain a dismounted IED are at greatest risk for a delayed amputation. Identifying and addressing those factors which lead to delayed amputation should be a priority for returning war veterans and focus of future studies.
Language: en
LA - en SN - 0890-5096 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2014.09.035 ID - ref1 ER -