TY - JOUR PY - 1984// TI - Social science involvement in voir dire: Preliminary data on the effectiveness of "scientific jury selection" JO - Behavioral sciences and the law A1 - Frederick, Jeffrey T. SP - 375 EP - 394 VL - 2 IS - 4 N2 - The validity of what has been termed "scientific" or "systematic" jury selection (SJS) techniques is addressed using data from two actual cases; one criminal and one civil. Data from the highly publicized Joan Little trial indicated that where validity data were available for the survey approach and in-court rating of authoritarianism, these techniques measured what they purported to measure. Validation data were not available for a third technique--in-court rating of nonverbal communication. Data from the civil case indicated that the survey approach could successfully predict verdicts of mock jurors. It is concluded that while these data are suggestive of the validity of two of the techniques used in SJS, more rigorous tests are essential before conclusions can be drawn.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 0735-3936 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370020405 ID - ref1 ER -