TY - JOUR PY - 2015// TI - An examination of the disparity between self-identified versus legally-identified rape victimization: a pilot study JO - Journal of American college health A1 - Marsil, Dorothy F. A1 - McNamara, Corinne SP - 416 EP - 420 VL - 64 IS - 5 N2 - OBJECTIVE: Researchers compared rape victimization based on self-identification to the current, federal legal definition in a pilot study of college students.

METHODS: The sample was comprised of 1,648 (69.8% female; 30.2% male) college students who completed the SES-SFV online.

RESULTS: Based on the current, legal definition of rape, 9.4% (11.1% female; 5.2% male) of students had been raped since being enrolled, but only 2.9% of students self-identified as being raped. Moreover, 15.1% of students reported ever being raped, with females acknowledging higher rates (19.7%) than males (4.3%).

CONCLUSIONS: Rape continues to be a major issue for colleges and universities. A serious concern is the disparity between the number of those who met the behavioral criteria for rape victimization based on the current, legal definition, but who did not self-identify as a victim. Universities must address this disparity by using multiple measures to assess the prevalence of sexual violence on campus.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 0744-8481 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2015.1107838 ID - ref1 ER -