TY - JOUR PY - 2016// TI - The effects of social identity threat and social identity affirmation on laypersons' perception of scientists JO - Public understanding of science A1 - Nauroth, Peter A1 - Gollwitzer, Mario A1 - Kozuchowski, Henrik A1 - Bender, Jens A1 - Rothmund, Tobias SP - 754 EP - 770 VL - 26 IS - 7 N2 - Public debates about socio-scientific issues (e.g. climate change or violent video games) are often accompanied by attacks on the reputation of the involved scientists. Drawing on the social identity approach, we report a minimal group experiment investigating the conditions under which scientists are perceived as non-prototypical, non-reputable, and incompetent.

RESULTS show that in-group affirming and threatening scientific findings (compared to a control condition) both alter laypersons' evaluations of the study: in-group affirming findings lead to more positive and in-group threatening findings to more negative evaluations. However, only in-group threatening findings alter laypersons' perceptions of the scientists who published the study: scientists were perceived as less prototypical, less reputable, and less competent when their research results imply a threat to participants' social identity compared to a non-threat condition. Our findings add to the literature on science reception research and have implications for understanding the public engagement with science.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 0963-6625 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662516631289 ID - ref1 ER -