TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2016//
TI  - Trait liabilities and specific promotive processes in psychopathology: the example of suicidal behavior
JO  - Journal of affective disorders
A1  - Buchman-Schmitt, Jennifer M.
A1  - Brislin, Sarah J.
A1  - Venables, Noah C.
A1  - Joiner, Thomas E.
A1  - Patrick, Christopher J.
SP  - 100
EP  - 108
VL  - 216
IS  - 
N2  - BACKGROUND: The RDoC matrix framework calls for investigation of mental health problems through analysis of core biobehavioral processes quantified and studied across multiple domains of measurement. Critics have raised concerns about RDoC, including overemphasis on biological concepts/measures and disregard for the principle of multifinality, which holds that identical biological predispositions can give rise to differing behavioral outcomes. The current work illustrates an ontogenetic process approach to addressing these concerns, focusing on biobehavioral traits corresponding to RDoC constructs as predictors, and suicidal behavior as the outcome variable. <br><br>METHOD: Data were collected from a young adult sample (N=105), preselected to enhance rates of suicidality. Participants completed self-report measures of traits (threat sensitivity, response inhibition) and suicide-specific processes. <br><br>RESULTS: We show that previously reported associations of traits of threat sensitivity and weak inhibitory control with suicidal behavior are mediated by more specific suicide-promoting processes-namely, thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide. LIMITATIONS: The sample was relatively small and the data were cross-sectional, limiting conclusions that can be drawn from the mediation analyses. <br><br>CONCLUSIONS: Given prior research documenting neurophysiological as well as psychological bases to these trait dispositions, the current work sets the stage for an intensive RDoC-oriented investigation of suicidal tendencies in which both traits and suicide-promoting processes are quantified using indicators from different domains of measurement. More broadly, this work illustrates how an RDoC research approach can contribute to a nuanced understanding of specific clinical problems, through consideration of how general biobehavioral liabilities interface with distinct problem-promoting processes.<br><br>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 0165-0327
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.050
ID  - ref1
ER  -