TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2016//
TI  - Evaluation of the pain threshold and tolerance of pain by martial arts athletes and non-athletes using a different methods and tools
JO  - Archives of budo: health promotion and prevention
A1  - Leźnicka, Katarzyna
A1  - Pawlak, Maciej
A1  - Białecka, Monika
A1  - Safranow, Krzysztof
A1  - Spieszny, Michał
A1  - Klocek, Tomasz
A1  - Cieszczyk, Paweł
SP  - e10909
EP  - e10909
VL  - 12
IS  - 1
N2  - Background and Study Aims: Control of pain by athletes and the quest for control over pain is an integral part of sports, but is also one of the most important skills in combat sports and large part of martial arts (direct contact with the opponent). Due to systematic exposure to brief periods of intense pain during training or competition, athletes need to learn how to effectively deal with these experiences. The aim of our research was the perception of pain in a group of martial arts athletes and non-athletes using different diagnostic methods involving thermal stimuli and mechanical, and the equivalence of these tests.     Material and Methods: The study involved 321 healthy men, aged 18 to 28 years. The martial arts group consisted of 140 athletes aged 18 to 28 years. The control group consisted of 181 students of the Faculty of Physical Culture, University of Szczecin, not involved in any sport at a professional level, aged between 18 and 26 years. Measurement of the pain threshold and pain tolerance was performed using Cold Pressor Test (CPT) and Pressure Pain Test (PPT).     Results: The study showed that the martial arts athletes had a different sensitivity to pain compared to non-athletes. This was reflected by both significantly higher tolerances to harmful cold and mechanical stimulation as well as a significantly higher mechanical pain threshold (p<0.001).     Conclusions: It seems that both tools and methods, CPT and PPT, can be accepted as adequate and equivalent in relation to the evaluation of tolerance to pain, but not for the pain threshold. The discrepancies in pain threshold results between these tests indicate the need for a few more tests.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 1643-8698
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/
ID  - ref1
ER  -