TY - JOUR
PY - 2017//
TI - Efficacy of a peer-led, recovery-oriented shared decision-making system: a pilot randomized controlled trial
JO - Psychiatric services
A1 - Yamaguchi, Sosei
A1 - Taneda, Ayano
A1 - Matsunaga, Asami
A1 - Sasaki, Natsuki
A1 - Mizuno, Masashi
A1 - Sawada, Yumiko
A1 - Sakata, Masuhiro
A1 - Fukui, Satoe
A1 - Hisanaga, Fumie
A1 - Bernick, Peter
A1 - Ito, Junichiro
SP - 1307
EP - 1311
VL - 68
IS - 12
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The effects of a comprehensive shared decision-making system based on the CommonGround approach and incorporating peer support and a computerized decision aid were investigated.
METHODS: A pilot randomized controlled trial with six-month follow-up was conducted in Japan. Fifty-six outpatients with mental illness were randomly allocated to a shared decision-making system (intervention) group or treatment as usual (control) group. The implementation process and several outcomes were compared between groups.
RESULTS: The core components and processes of shared decision making were observed in the intervention group more frequently than in the control group. The intervention group also reported a significantly more positive participants' view of the relationship with their doctor than the control group. The intervention did not have a significant effect on most clinical and recovery-related outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The shared decision-making system appeared to partly improve patients' perceptions of communication and relationships with doctors but did not have a significant effect on other patient-level outcomes.
Language: en
LA - en SN - 1075-2730 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600544 ID - ref1 ER -