TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2018//
TI  - A pilot randomized controlled trial of on-line interventions to improve sleep quality in adults after mild or moderate traumatic brain injury
JO  - Clinical rehabilitation
A1  - Theadom, Alice M.
A1  - Barker-Collo, Suzanne
A1  - Jones, Kelly
A1  - Dudley, Margaret
A1  - Vincent, Norah
A1  - Feigin, Valery
SP  - 619
EP  - 629
VL  - 32
IS  - 5
N2  - OBJECTIVE: To explore feasibility and potential efficacy of on-line interventions for sleep quality following a traumatic brain injury (TBI). <br><br>DESIGN: A two parallel-group, randomized controlled pilot study. SETTING: Community-based. SUBJECTS: In all, 24 participants (mean age: 35.9 ± 11.8 years) who reported experiencing sleep difficulties between 3 and 36 months after a mild or moderate TBI. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive either a cognitive behaviour therapy or an education intervention on-line. Both interventions were self-completed for 20-30 minutes per week over a six-week period. MAIN MEASURES: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index assessed self-reported sleep quality with actigraphy used as an objective measure of sleep quality. The CNS Vital Signs on-line neuropsychological test assessed cognitive functioning and the Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms and Quality of Life after Brain Injury questionnaires were completed pre and post intervention. <br><br>RESULTS: Both programmes demonstrated feasibility for use post TBI, with 83.3% of participants completing the interventions. The cognitive behaviour therapy group experienced significant reductions ( F = 5.47, p = 0.04) in sleep disturbance (mean individual change = -4.00) in comparison to controls post intervention (mean individual change = -1.50) with a moderate effect size of 1.17. There were no significant group differences on objective sleep quality, cognitive functioning, post-concussion symptoms or quality of life. <br><br>CONCLUSION: On-line programmes designed to improve sleep are feasible for use for adults following mild-to-moderate TBI. Based on the effect size identified in this pilot study, 128 people (64 per group) would be needed to determine clinical effectiveness.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 0269-2155
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215517736671
ID  - ref1
ER  -