TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2018//
TI  - Crash avoidance and driver assistance technologies - are they used?
JO  - Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour
A1  - Reagan, Ian J.
A1  - Cicchino, Jessica B.
A1  - Kerfoot, Laura B.
A1  - Weast, Rebecca A.
SP  - 176
EP  - 190
VL  - 52
IS  - 
N2  - Crash avoidance technologies have potential to mitigate collisions, and actual crash reductions have been identified for some systems. This study measured observed on-off rates of these technologies as an indicator of use, with a focus on lane maintenance systems (i.e., designed to keep vehicles within lanes by warning, braking, and/or steering) and studied factors that might increase their acceptance and use. Vehicles from nine manufacturers fitted with lane maintenance systems were observed at service departments during 2016. Systems were turned on in 51% of 983 vehicles. The activation rate was higher for systems with braking/steering interventions and vibrating warnings and decreased with total mileage. Large proportions of front crash prevention (93%), blind spot monitoring (99%), rear cross-traffic alert (97%), and driver monitoring alert (90%) systems were enabled, and most optional settings were set to factory defaults. Owner surveys linked to observations showed that drivers who had lane maintenance systems turned off believed warnings were distracting and unnecessary compared with drivers whose systems were on.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 1369-8478
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.015
ID  - ref1
ER  -