TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2018//
TI  - Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing: a reply to Räsänen
JO  - Bioethics
A1  - Rodger, Daniel
A1  - Blackshaw, Bruce P.
A1  - Wilcox, Clinton
SP  - 215
EP  - 219
VL  - 32
IS  - 3
N2  - In 'Pro-life arguments against infanticide and why they are not convincing' Joona Räsänen argues that Christopher Kaczor's objections to Giubilini and Minerva's position on infanticide are not persuasive. We argue that Räsänen's criticism is largely misplaced, and that he has not engaged with Kaczor's strongest arguments against infanticide. We reply to each of Räsänen's criticisms, drawing on the full range of Kaczor's arguments, as well as adding some of our own.<br><br>© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 0269-9702
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12423
ID  - ref1
ER  -