TY - JOUR PY - 2018// TI - Is arming teachers our nation's best response to gun violence? The perspective of public health students JO - American journal of public health A1 - Rogers, Melanie A1 - Lara Ovares, Ericka A. A1 - Ogunleye, Olushola Olaitan A1 - Twyman, Tara A1 - Akkus, Cem A1 - Patel, Kalpita A1 - Fadlalla, Marwa SP - 862 EP - 863 VL - 108 IS - 7 N2 -

The year 2018 has seen 18 instances of gun-related injuries and fatalities at American schools in fewer than 100 days.1 We thought the outrage following the murder of 20 children in the Sandy Hook Elementary School was enough to force a national dialogue on gun violence 6 years ago, but it was not. Nevertheless, 2018 has been different. This year, the students affected by the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida, have started a national student-led campaign against gun violence, culminating in the March for Our Lives movement. As graduate public health students who have the honor of serving in the 2018 AJPH Student Think Tank, we wish to use our platform to uplift and join the voices of the brave high-school students who have been thrust into the national spotlight to call for better solutions to gun violence in schools. In the wake of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, political discourse has shifted to the proposition of arming school teachers with guns as a means of reducing the mortality rate of school-related shootings. We wonder if policymakers have considered the intricacies of implementing a plan to arm teachers. Funding of any program is imperative—quality firearms are expensive, and we question how this would be paid for when schools already struggle with funding for basic educational resources. Teachers cannot be asked to purchase a firearm in addition to pencils and paper. When would teachers undergo firearms qualification training, and who would be responsible for training them? Unless educators undergo training comparable to law enforcement officers, their ability to stop or prevent a mass shooting is questionable. Furthermore, educators may not wish to work in such conditions—multiple professors resigned from the University of Texas after firearms were permitted on campus.2 It is unethical to place this burden on those who do not wish to participate in such a program that could result in inflicting injury or death upon other people. Firearms in a classroom setting present enormous risk to life, limb, and mental well-being. Improper firearm storage, a common problem for American gun owners ...

Language: en

LA - en SN - 0090-0036 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304477 ID - ref1 ER -