TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2019//
TI  - More on the question 'When does absence of evidence constitute evidence of absence?' How Bayesian confirmation theory can logically support the answer
JO  - Forensic science international
A1  - Taroni, F.
A1  - Bozza, S.
A1  - Hicks, T.
A1  - Garbolino, P.
SP  - e59
EP  - e63
VL  - 301
IS  - 
N2  - In forensic science it is not rare that common sayings are used to support particular inferences. A typical example is the adage 'The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence'. This paper analyzes the rationale hidden behind such statement and it offers a structural way to approach the analysis of this particular adage throughout a careful analysis of four different scenarios.<br><br>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 0379-0738
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.044
ID  - ref1
ER  -