TY - JOUR
PY - 2019//
TI - Household preparedness for emergency events: a cross-sectional survey on residents in four regions of China
JO - BMJ open
A1 - Chen, Chao Yi
A1 - Xu, Wei
A1 - Dai, Yajun
A1 - Xu, Weilan
A1 - Liu, Chaojie
A1 - Wu, Qunhong
A1 - Gao, Lijun
A1 - Kang, Zheng
A1 - Hao, Yanhua
A1 - Ning, Ning
SP - e032462
EP - e032462
VL - 9
IS - 11
N2 - OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess household preparedness for emergency events and its determinants in China.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on 3541 households in China in 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Households were selected using a stratified cluster sampling strategy, representing central, eastern, western and southern regions of China. The designed questionnaires were administered through face-to-face interviews. OUTCOME MEASURES: Household emergency preparedness was measured with 14 indicators, tapping into the supply of nine emergency necessities (food and water, extra batteries, battery-powered radio, battery-operated torch, first-aid kit, gas mask, fire extinguisher, escape ropes, whistle), coverage of accident insurance, knowledge of local emergency response systems (emergency numbers, exit routes and shelters) and availability of a household evacuation plan. If an individual acted on 9 of the 14 indicators, they were deemed well prepared. Logistic regression models were established to identify predictors of well preparedness based on 3541 returned questionnaires containing no missing values.
RESULTS: Only 9.9% of households were well prepared for emergencies: 53.6% did not know what to do and 31.6% did not want to think about it. A higher level of preparedness was found in the respondents who have attained higher education (adjusted OR=0.826 compared with the higher level), participated in emergency training activities (adjusted OR=2.299), had better emergency knowledge (adjusted OR=2.043), reported less fate-submissiveness (adjusted OR=1.385) and more self-reliance (adjusted OR=1.349), prior exposure to emergency events (adjusted OR=1.280) and held more positive attitudes towards preparedness (adjusted OR=1.286).
CONCLUSION: Household preparedness for emergency events is poor in China. Lack of motivation, negative attitude to preparedness and knowledge shortfall are major but remediable barriers for household preparedness.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Language: en
LA - en SN - 2044-6055 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032462 ID - ref1 ER -