TY - JOUR PY - 2020// TI - Treatment delivery preferences associated with type of mental disorder and perceived treatment barriers among Mexican university students JO - Journal of Adolescent Health A1 - Benjet, Corina A1 - Wittenborn, Andrea A1 - Gutiérrez-García, Raúl A. A1 - Albor, Yesica Cristina A1 - Contreras, Eunice Vargas A1 - Hernández, Sergio Cruz A1 - Valdés-García, Karla Patricia A1 - Monroy, Iris Ruby A1 - Peláez Cedrés, Alvaro Julio A1 - Hernández Uribe, Praxedis Cristina A1 - Covarrubias Díaz-Couder, Anabell A1 - Quevedo Chávez, Guillermo E. A1 - Paz-Peréz, María Abigal A1 - Medina-Mora, Maria Elena A1 - Bruffaerts, Ronny SP - ePub EP - ePub VL - ePub IS - ePub N2 - PURPOSE: Although Internet-based electronic health (eHealth) interventions could potentially reduce mental health disparities, especially in college students in under-resourced countries, little is known about the relative acceptability of eHealth versus in-person treatment modalities and the treatment barriers associated with a preference for one type over the other.

METHODS: Participants were from the 2018-2019 cohort of the University Project for Healthy Students (PUERTAS), a Web-based survey of incoming first-year students in Mexico and part of the World Mental Health International College Student Survey initiative. A total of 7,849 first-year students, 54.73% female, from five Mexican universities participated. We estimated correlates of preference for eHealth delivery over in-person modalities with a multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of students prefer in-person services, 36% showed no preference for in-person over eHealth, 19% prefer not to use services of any kind, and 7% preferred eHealth over in-person treatment delivery. Being embarrassed, worried about harm to one's academic career, wanting to handle problems on one's own, beliefs about treatment efficacy, having depression, and having attention-deficient hyperactivity disorder were associated with a clear preference for eHealth delivery methods with odds ratios ranging from 1.47 to 2.59.

CONCLUSIONS: Although more students preferred in-person services over eHealth, those reporting attitudinal barriers (i.e., embarrassment, stigma, wanting to handle problems on one's own, and beliefs about treatment efficacy) and with depression or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder had a greater preference for eHealth interventions suggesting these are students to whom eHealth interventions could be targeted to alleviate symptoms and/or as a bridge to future in-person treatment.

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 1054-139X UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.01.025 ID - ref1 ER -