TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2020//
TI  - Localizing modality compatibility effects: evidence from dual-task interference
JO  - Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance
A1  - Wirth, Robert
A1  - Koch, Iring
A1  - Kunde, Wilfried
SP  - ePub
EP  - ePub
VL  - ePub
IS  - ePub
N2  - Performance is typically superior with modality-compatible stimulus-response sets (e.g., responding vocally to auditory stimuli and manually to visual stimuli) than with modality-incompatible sets (e.g., responding vocally to visual stimuli and manually to auditory stimuli). Here we studied the information-processing stage at which these modality compatibility effects arise. In three experiments using a dual-task setup, we demonstrated that these compatibility effects arose (at least partly) prior to a capacity-limited central stage that is commonly believed to be the origin of dual-task costs. We suggest that demands to employ a specific effector system bias perceptual processing toward effector-compatible stimulus modalities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 0096-1523
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000873
ID  - ref1
ER  -