TY - JOUR PY - 2020// TI - The role of palliative care in acute trauma: when is it appropriate? JO - American journal of surgery A1 - Esquibel, Brendon M. A1 - Waller, Christine J. A1 - Borgert, Andrew J. A1 - Kallies, Kara J. A1 - Harter, Thomas D. A1 - Cogbill, Thomas H. SP - ePub EP - ePub VL - ePub IS - ePub N2 - INTRODUCTION: We hypothesized that trauma providers are reticent to consider palliative measures in acute trauma care. METHODS: An electronic survey based on four patient scenarios with identical vital signs and serious blunt injuries, but differing ages and frailty scores was sent to WTA and EAST members. RESULTS: 509 (24%) providers completed the survey. Providers supported early transition to comfort care in 85% old-frail, 53% old-fit, 77% young-frail, and 30% young-fit patients. Providers were more likely to transition frail vs. fit patients with (OR = 4.8 [3.8-6.3], p < 0.001) or without (OR = 16.7 [12.5-25.0], p < 0.001) an advanced directive (AD) and more likely to transition old vs. young patients with (OR = 2.0 [1.6-2.6], p < 0.001) or without (OR = 4.2 [2.8-5.0], p < 0.001) an AD. CONCLUSIONS: In specific clinical situations, there was wide acceptance among trauma providers for the early institution of palliative measures. Provider decision-making was primarily based on patient frailty and age. ADs were helpful for fit or young patients. Provider demographics did not impact decision-making.
Language: en
LA - en SN - 0002-9610 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.002 ID - ref1 ER -