TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2020//
TI  - Suicidal ideation is insensitive to suicide risk after ED discharge: performance characteristics of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener
JO  - Academic emergency medicine
A1  - Simpson, Scott
A1  - Goans, Christian
A1  - Loh, Ryan
A1  - Ryall, Karen
A1  - Allana Middleton, Molly Christin
A1  - Dalton, Alicia
SP  - ePub
EP  - ePub
VL  - ePub
IS  - ePub
N2  - OBJECTIVES: We describe the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)-Clinical Practice Screener's ability to predict suicide and emergency department (ED) visits for self-harm in the year following an ED encounter.     METHODS: Screening data from adult patients' first ED encounter during a 27-month study period were analyzed. Patients were excluded if they died during the encounter or left without being identified. The outcomes were suicide as reported by the state health department and a recurrent ED visit for suicide attempt or self-harm reported by the state hospital association. Multivariable regression examined the screener's correlation with these outcomes.     RESULTS: Among 92,643 patients analyzed, eleven (0.01%) patients died by suicide within a year after ED visit. The screener's sensitivity and specificity for suicide by 30 days was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.00-0.41) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-0.99). Sensitivity and specificity were better for predicting self-harm by 30 days: 0.53 (95% CI, 0.42-0.64) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.97-0.97) respectively. Multivariable regression demonstrated that screening risk remained associated with both suicide and self-harm outcomes in the presence of covariates. Suicide risk was not mitigated by hospitalization or psychiatric intervention in the ED.     CONCLUSIONS: The C-SSRS screener is insensitive to suicide risk after ED discharge. Most patients who died by suicide screened negative and did not receive psychiatric services in the ED. Moreover, most patients with suicidal ideation die by causes other than suicide. The screener was more sensitive for predicting non-fatal self-harm and may inform a comprehensive risk assessment. These results compel us to re-imagine the provision of emergency psychiatric services.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 1069-6563
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.14198
ID  - ref1
ER  -