TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2022//
TI  - Developing a national trauma research action plan (NTRAP): results from the injury prevention research gap Delphi survey
JO  - Journal of trauma and acute care surgery
A1  - Cooper, Zara
A1  - Herrera-Escobar, Juan P.
A1  - Phuong, Jimmy
A1  - Braverman, Maxwell A.
A1  - Bonne, Stephanie
A1  - Knudson, Mary Margaret
A1  - Rivara, Frederick P.
A1  - Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali
A1  - Price, Michelle A.
A1  - Bulger, Eileen M.
A1  - Panel, the NTRAP Injury Prevention
SP  - ePub
EP  - ePub
VL  - ePub
IS  - ePub
N2  - Background     In its 2016 report on trauma care, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine called for the establishment of a National Trauma Research Action Plan (NTRAP) to strengthen and guide future trauma research. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. We describe the gap analysis and high priority research questions generated from the NTRAP panel on injury prevention.     Methods     Experts in injury prevention research were recruited to identify current gaps in injury prevention research, generate research questions and establish the priority of these questions using a consensus-driven Delphi survey approach from December 2019 through September 2020. Participants were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability with both military and civilian representatives. Participants were encouraged, but not required, to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population; Intervention; Compare/Control; Outcome model. On subsequent surveys, participants were asked to rank the priority of each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low, medium, and high priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category.     Results     Twenty-eight subject matter experts generated 394 questions in 12 topic areas. By Round 3 of the Delphi, 367 (93.1%) questions reached consensus, of which 169 (46.1%) were determined to be high priority, 196 (53.4%) medium priority, and 2 (0.5%) low priority. Among the 169 high priority questions, suicide (29.6%), firearm violence (20.1%), and violence prevention (18.3%) were the most prevalent topic areas.     Conclusions     This Delphi gap analysis of injury prevention research identified 169 high priority research questions that will help guide investigators in future injury prevention research. Funding agencies and researchers should consider these gaps when they prioritize future research.     Level of evidence     Level IV<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 2163-0755
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003665
ID  - ref1
ER  -