TY - JOUR PY - 2022// TI - Psychometric properties of the German version of the Rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire in adolescents after traumatic brain injury and their proxies JO - Journal of clinical medicine A1 - Bockhop, Fabian A1 - Zeldovich, Marina A1 - Greving, Sven A1 - Krenz, Ugne A1 - Cunitz, Katrin A1 - Timmermann, Dagmar A1 - Bonke, Elena M. A1 - Bonfert, Michaela V. A1 - Koerte, Inga K. A1 - Kieslich, Matthias A1 - Roediger, Maike A1 - Staebler, Michael A1 - Berweck, Steffen A1 - Paul, Thomas A1 - Brockmann, Knut A1 - Rojczyk, Philine A1 - Buchheim, Anna A1 - von Steinbuechel, Nicole SP - e319 EP - e319 VL - 12 IS - 1 N2 - The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) assesses post-concussion symptoms (PCS) after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The current study examines the applicability of self-report and proxy versions of the German RPQ in adolescents (13-17 years) after TBI. We investigated reliability and validity on the total and scale score level. Construct validity was investigated by correlations with the Post-Concussion Symptoms Inventory (PCSI-SR13), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and by hypothesis testing regarding individuals' characteristics. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed adolescent-proxy agreement. In total, 148 adolescents after TBI and 147 proxies completed the RPQ. Cronbach's α (0.81-0.91) and McDonald's ω (0.84-0.95) indicated good internal consistency. The three-factor structure outperformed the unidimensional model. The RPQ was strongly correlated with the PCSI-SR13 (self-report: r = 0.80; proxy: r = 0.75) and moderately-strongly with GAD-7 and PHQ-9 (self-report: r = 0.36, r = 0.35; proxy: r = 0.53, r = 0.62). Adolescent-proxy agreement was fair (ICC [2,1] = 0.44, CI(95%) [0.41, 0.47]). Overall, both self-report and proxy assessment forms of the German RPQ are suitable for application in adolescents after TBI. As proxy ratings tend to underestimate PCS, self-reports are preferable for evaluations. Only if a patient is unable to answer, a proxy should be used as a surrogate.
Language: en
LA - en SN - 2077-0383 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010319 ID - ref1 ER -