TY - JOUR PY - 2023// TI - Maoist hybridity? A comparative analysis of the links between insurgent strategic practice and tactical hybridity in contemporary non-state armed groups JO - Studies in conflict and terrorism A1 - Stoddard, Edward SP - 913 EP - 937 VL - 46 IS - 6 N2 - While the recent literature on hybrid warfare has focused overwhelmingly on Russia, military tactical hybridity among non-state actors has received less attention, and minimal comparative examination. This is surprising as the range of non-state actors successfully using hybridized irregular-conventional tactics (increasingly symmetrically) against states has grown. Examining this phenomenon comparatively in three divergent cases (Islamic State, Boko Haram, the Houthi Movement), this article tests an often-overlooked argument stating that military hybridity among non-state actors is a result of these groups' common adoption of a specific form of Maoist-style warfare strategy - emulative insurgency.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 1057-610X UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1792724 ID - ref1 ER -