TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2023//
TI  - Methodological quality of Campbell Systematic Reviews has improved over the past decade
JO  - Campbell systematic reviews
A1  - Li, Yanfei
A1  - Dewidar, Omar
A1  - Wang, Xiaoqin
A1  - Ghogomu, Elizabeth
A1  - Wadhwani, Arpana
A1  - Guo, Ke
A1  - Ma, Mina
A1  - Barbeau, Victoria
A1  - Pan, Bei
A1  - Abdelrazeq, Leenah
A1  - Li, Zijun
A1  - Alghamyan, Amjad
A1  - Guo, Liping
A1  - Jahel, Fatima
A1  - Ren, Junjie
A1  - Madani, Mohamad Tarek
A1  - Allam, Sarah
A1  - Hussain, Tarannum
A1  - Yang, Minyan
A1  - Kojan, Waleed
A1  - Li, Xiuxia
A1  - Yang, Kehu
A1  - Welch, Vivian
SP  - e1358
EP  - e1358
VL  - 19
IS  - 4
N2  - The Campbell Collaboration was established in 2001 to promote positive social and economic change through supporting the conduct of high-quality systematic reviews and promoting their use in decision making (Welch, 2018). Wang et al. (2021) found that the methodological quality of Campbell reviews of intervention effectiveness published between 2011 and 2018 improved over time, and particularly after the introduction of the 2014 Methodological Expectations for Conducting Campbell Intervention Reviews (MECCIR) (Wang et al., 2021). For the 96 systematic reviews published between 2011 and 2018, the methodologic quality as assessed by the AMSTAR tool was 16 (17%) reviews rated as high quality, 40 (42%) as moderate, 24 (25%) as low, and 16 (17%) as critically low (Wang et al., 2021).     Based on this assessment, Campbell provided feedback to all editorial teams on the quality of reviews and areas for improvement. We decided to conduct a follow-up analysis to evaluate the quality of Campbell reviews published since 2018 and compare the findings with the baseline assessment to identify areas where improvements are still needed.     We conducted the quality assessment of Campbell systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness published in the past 5 years (February 2018 to November 2022) using the AMSTAR 2.0 tool (Shea et al., 2017). A total of 77 intervention reviews were included. All analyses were conducted using R software...<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 1891-1803
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1358
ID  - ref1
ER  -