TY - JOUR PY - 2023// TI - Assessing the risk of intentional self-harm in montelukast users: an updated Sentinel System analysis using ICD-10 coding JO - Journal of asthma A1 - Apata, Jummai A1 - Lyons, Jennifer G. A1 - Bradley, Marie C. A1 - Ma, Yong A1 - Kempner, Maria E. A1 - Kim, Ivone A1 - Eworuke, Efe A1 - Pennap, Dinci A1 - Mosholder, Andrew SP - ePub EP - ePub VL - ePub IS - ePub N2 - BACKGROUND: Montelukast prescribing information includes a Boxed Warning issued in March 2020 regarding neuropsychiatric adverse events. A previous Sentinel System study of asthma patients from 2000 to 2015 did not demonstrate an increased risk of intentional self-harm measured using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, with montelukast compared to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).

METHODS: Using a new user cohort study design, we examined intentional self-harm events in patients aged 10 years and older who were incident users of either montelukast or ICS as monotherapy, with a diagnosis of asthma, between October 1, 2015, to June 30, 2022, in the Sentinel System. We measured intentional self-harm using ICD-10-CM codes, which may have better accuracy for capturing suicide attempts than ICD-9-CM codes. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance baseline covariates. We performed subgroup analyses by age group, sex, psychiatric history, and pre/post Boxed Warning era and conducted sensitivity analyses varying type of care setting of the outcome and exposure episode gaps.

RESULTS: Among 752,230 and 724,855 patients in the montelukast and ICS exposure groups, respectively, we found no association between montelukast use and self-harm compared to ICS use [Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval): 0.96 (0.85, 1.08)]. This finding was consistent across all subgroups, and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION: Our results cannot exclude other neuropsychiatric idiosyncratic reactions to montelukast. Compared to the previous Sentinel study, this study identified about double the rate of self-harm events, suggesting a greater sensitivity of ICD-10 codes for measuring self-harm than ICD-9.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 0277-0903 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2023.2293064 ID - ref1 ER -