TY - JOUR PY - 2024// TI - National and state-level trends in the availability of mental health treatment services tailored to individuals ordered to treatment by a court: United States, 2016, 2018, and 2020 JO - Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology A1 - Pro, George A1 - Horton, Heather A1 - Tody, Brooklyn A1 - Gu, Mofan A1 - Washington, Taylor A1 - Williams, Ashley A1 - Gorvine, Margaret M. A1 - Johnson, O'Dell A1 - Lovelady, Nakita A1 - Jackson, Timikia A1 - Ray, Azizi A1 - Montgomery, Brooke A1 - Zaller, Nick SP - ePub EP - ePub VL - ePub IS - ePub N2 - PURPOSE: We sought to identify trends and characteristics associated with the availability of tailored mental health services for individuals involved in the criminal justice system and ordered to treatment by a court, nationally in the US and by state.

METHODS: We used National Mental Health Services Survey to identify outpatient mental health treatment facilities in the US (2016 n = 4744; 2018 n = 4626; 2020 n = 4869). We used clustered multiple logistic regression to identify changes over time as well as facility- and state-level factors associated with the availability of specialty court-ordered services.

RESULTS: Slightly more than half of the outpatient mental health treatment facilities offered specialized services for individuals ordered to treatment by a court, with wide variation between states. Nationally, there was a significant increase in the odds of offering court-ordered treatment in 2020 compared to 2016 (aOR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.06-1.27, p < 0.01). Notable associations included offering integrated substance use treatment (versus none, aOR = 2.95, 95% CI = 2.70-3.22, p < 0.0001) and offering trauma therapy (versus none, aOR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.85-2.27, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: The availability of mental health services for individuals ordered to treatment by a court is growing nationally but several states are lagging behind. Court ordered treatment is a promising strategy to improve health and reduce reliance on the carceral system as a healthcare provider. At the same time, we express caution around disparities within behavioral health courts and advocate for equity in access to incarceration alternatives.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 0933-7954 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-023-02589-8 ID - ref1 ER -