TY - JOUR
PY - 2007//
TI - The impact of context on assessments of mental capacity by psychiatrists
JO - Journal of mental health
A1 - Olumoroti, O.J.
A1 - Kassim, A.
A1 - Hotopf, M.
SP - 521
EP - 528
VL - 16
IS - 4
N2 - BACKGROUND: The assessment of mental capacity in patients who have self harmed is often difficult. Contextual factors may influence judgements on mental capacity. Aims: To determine the proportion of consultant psychiatrists who judge a self harming patient described in a vignette likely to have mental capacity, and to test the hypothesis that judgements are influenced by contextual factors which should not necessarily influence mental capacity.
METHOD: Four hundred and four consultant psychiatrists were randomized to receive one of four vignettes describing a woman who took a serious paracetamol overdose and required liver transplantation.
RESULTS: Seventy percent of questionnaires were returned. Forty-nine percent of participants thought that the patient lacked mental capacity. There was no statistically significant effect of vignette on judgement of mental capacity (p =.4). Psychiatric speciality of the participants influenced capacity judgements (p =.06), with old age psychiatrists being least likely to judge her as lacking capacity (36%) and psychotherapists being most likely to do so (80%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that clinicians' assessments of capacity are not greatly influenced by context, but that psychiatric speciality has some impact. Declaration of interest: None. © Shadowfax Publishing and Informa UK Ltd.
Language: en
LA - en SN - 0963-8237 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638230701482337 ID - ref1 ER -