TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2003//
TI  - Effect of active vs. passive recovery on repeat suicide run time
JO  - Journal of strength and conditioning research
A1  - Graham, James E.
A1  - Douglas Boatwright, J.
A1  - Hunskor, Martha J.
A1  - Howell, Dan C.
SP  - 338
EP  - 341
VL  - 17
IS  - 2
N2  - This study was conducted to evaluate the difference between active and passive recovery methods during successive suicide runs by Division I women's collegiate basketball athletes (n = 14). Testing consisted of sprinting suicides on the basketball court using both traditional (short) and reverse-sequence (long) protocols. Two 90-second recovery methods were used, passive (standing still) and active (slow self-paced jogging). Although successive run time was reduced by a mean of 0.55 seconds after passive recovery relative to active, it did not reach significance (p = 0.09). Likewise, the difference between long and short line versions was nonsignificant (p = 0.41). Therefore, neither line sequence nor 90-second recovery technique appears to influence subsequent run time when performing 2 maximal-effort suicides.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 1064-8011
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0338:eoavpr>2.0.co;2
ID  - ref1
ER  -