TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2011//
TI  - Evaluation of risk by patients' and with clinicians' ratings: a CORE-OM and CORE-A investigation
JO  - Clinical psychology and psychotherapy
A1  - Bedford, Alan
A1  - Lukic, Goran
A1  - Tibbles, Jennifer
SP  - 244
EP  - 249
VL  - 18
IS  - 3
N2  - While Whewell and Bonanno reported significant relationships between therapists' ratings of risk and patients' ratings of categorized Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measures (CORE-OM) risk items, Rowsell and Stennett-Cox found that only two non-risk items of the total 34 CORE-OM items correlated significantly with reported risk behaviours. The current study of 870 patients examined the intercorrelations of the CORE-OM item matrix, including the 28 non-risk items, and their correlations with the Risk domain items. Additionally, CORE-Assessment clinicians' risk ratings were compared with the patients' risk self-ratings. The results differed from the findings of Rowsell and Stennett-Cox and provided validatory evidence supplementing that of Whewell and Bonanno. The Harm to Self items appeared to be of particular behavioural significance.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 1063-3995
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.714
ID  - ref1
ER  -