TY - JOUR PY - 2010// TI - The role of criterion A2 in the DSM-IV diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder JO - Biological psychiatry A1 - Karam, Elie George A1 - Andrews, Gavin A1 - Bromet, Evelyn A1 - Petukhova, Maria A1 - Ruscio, Ayelet Meron A1 - Salamoun, Mariana A1 - Sampson, Nancy A1 - Stein, Dan J. A1 - Alonso, Jordi A1 - Andrade, Laura Helena A1 - Angermeyer, Matthias A1 - Demyttenaere, Koen A1 - de Girolamo, Giovanni A1 - de Graaf, Ron A1 - Florescu, Silvia A1 - Gureje, Oye A1 - Kaminer, Debra A1 - Kotov, Roman A1 - Lee, Sing A1 - Lépine, Jean-Pierre A1 - Medina-Mora, Maria Elena A1 - Oakley Browne, Mark A. A1 - Posada-Villa, Jose A1 - Sagar, Rajesh A1 - Shalev, Arieh Y. A1 - Takeshima, Tadashi A1 - Tomov, Toma A1 - Kessler, Ronald C. SP - 465 EP - 473 VL - 68 IS - 5 N2 - BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the utility of DSM-IV posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criterion A2 (A2): that exposure to a potentially traumatic experience (PTE; PTSD criterion A1) is accompanied by intense fear, helplessness, or horror. METHODS: Lifetime DSM-IV PTSD was assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview in community surveys of 52,826 respondents across 21 countries in the World Mental Health Surveys. RESULTS: Of 28,490 representative PTEs reported by respondents, 37.6% met criterion A2, a proportion higher than the proportions meeting other criteria (B-F; 5.4%-9.6%). Conditional prevalence of meeting all other criteria for a diagnosis of PTSD given a PTE was significantly higher in the presence (9.7%) than absence (.1%) of A2. However, as only 1.4% of respondents who met all other criteria failed A2, the estimated prevalence of PTSD increased only slightly (from 3.64% to 3.69%) when A2 was not required for diagnosis. Posttraumatic stress disorder with or without criterion A2 did not differ in persistence or predicted consequences (subsequent suicidal ideation or secondary disorders) depending on presence-absence of A2. Furthermore, as A2 was by far the most commonly reported symptom of PTSD, initial assessment of A2 would be much less efficient than screening other criteria in quickly ruling out a large proportion of noncases. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of A2 from the DSM-IV criterion set would reduce the complexity of diagnosing PTSD, while not substantially increasing the number of people who qualify for diagnosis. Criterion A2 should consequently be reconceptualized as a risk factor for PTSD rather than as a diagnostic requirement.
Language: en
LA - en SN - 0006-3223 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.04.032 ID - ref1 ER -