Article Title,Year,Volume,Issue,Page Range,Author
All necessary means to protect civilians: what the intervention in Libya says about the relationship between the jus in bello and the jus ad bellum,2012,17,1,117-146,Lehmann
Cyber attacks self-defence and the problem of attribution,2012,17,2,229-244,Tsagourias
Cyber warfare and the notion of direct participation in hostilities,2012,17,2,279-297,Turns
The challenge of autonomous lethal robotics to international humanitarian law,2013,18,1,5-23,Grut
Human rights beyond borders: a new era in human rights accountability for transnational counter-terrorism operations?,2013,18,2,233-258,Conte
Targeted killings: Contemporary challenges risks and opportunities,2013,18,2,259-288,Bachmann
Elimination of the chemical weapons stockpile of Syria,2014,19,1,7-23,Trapp
Jus ad bellum and American targeted use of force to fight terrorism around the world,2014,19,2,211-250,Henriksen
The (ir)relevance of human suffering: humanitarian intervention and Saudi Arabia's operation decisive storm in Yemen,2019,24,1,1-33,Buys
Uniting for peace not aggression: responding to chemical weapons in Syria without breaking the law,2019,24,1,71-110,Barber
International humanitarian law and non-state practice in armed conflict: combatant's privilege and Kurdish fighters in Syria,2019,24,2,271-296,Rothkopf
Leaking like a sieve? Transfer restraints on small arms light weapons and ammunition,2019,24,2,325-342,Alley
Western gunrunners (Middle-)Eastern casualties: unlawfully trading arms with states engulfed in Yemeni civil war?,2019,24,3,503-535,Ferro
Pillars not principles: the status of humanity and military necessity in the law of armed conflict,2020,25,1,1-31,Winter
'Necessity knows no law': the resurrection of kriegsraison through the US targeted killing programme,2017,22,3,463-496,Connolly
The war of words with terrorism: an assessment of three approaches to pursue and prevent,2017,22,3,523-551,Walker