Citation

Fontanel J. J. Peace Res. 1986; 23(2): 175-182.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1986, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/002234338602300207

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Unlike its European counterparts, the peace movement in France is not very strong. The reasons for this are many: The Munich Syndrome, a contempt for pacifism confused with cowardice, a desire for national independence in defense, a belief in the global role of France, an absence of genuine defense alternatives acceptable to the majority of French, the role played by the Communist party, the in capability of groups favoring disarmament to agree among themselves on a minimal platform, poor relations between trade unions, the relative weakness of religious influence, and the compromises necessary in the race for power. It is difficult to unravel clearly causes from consequences, but it seems that dominant factors are national independence, a wish to avoid conflicts with an army traumatized by decolonization and lost wars, internal dissension among those who favor disarmament, and the absence of a real alternative despite the skepticism surrounding the question of effective deterrence strategy. The French look to the chief of state for their defense. However, there are discordant voices, al though these do not express themselves in pacifist terms. The last years of the 20th century will be marked by technological, strategic and social changes which will redistribute some cards, among them defense. The peace movement could profit by these uncertain developments for its reinforcement.