Citation

Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL, Collins A, Wardell J. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1987; 13(4): 606-614.

Affiliation

Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1987, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2959743

Abstract

In Experiment 1, blindfolded observers judged (a) the distance of pathways felt by hand and (b) the straight-line distance between pathway endpoints inferred from such exploration. In Experiment 2, blindfolded observers made corresponding estimates after traversing similar pathways on foot. Pathways were explored under three different speeds. Under both manipulatory and ambulatory exploration, there was substantial length distortion of inferred distance: The straight-line distance was increasingly overestimated with increases in the length of the explored pathway. With manipulatory exploration, slower movements increased length distortion, but duration effects proved secondary to effects of spatial extent. For ambulatory exploration, no duration effects were obtained. Observers used time-independent heuristics, that is, a footstep metric for estimating the pathway actually travelled and a spatial imaging strategy for estimating the inferred line between pathway endpoints. The studies establish length distortion as a general phenomenon in movement space and identify its major causes as spatial rather than temporal.

Language: en