Citation

Bentin S, Moscovitch M, Heth I. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1992; 18(6): 1270-1283.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1992, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

1447551

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded on the scalp were shown to be sensitive indicators of the strength of a memory trace on both implicit and explicit tests of memory. In explicit recognition tests, the amplitude of a positive potential identified as P300 was larger for "old" than for "new" words regardless of whether the subject categorized the items correctly. This effect, however, was statistically reliable only when the recognition memory (d') was relatively high. In contrast to ERPs, the reaction times in explicit recognition were sensitive to accuracy but not to repetition. In implicit tests, lexical decisions to repeated words were faster than to newly presented words. The magnitude of the repetition effect varied neither with elapsed time since the last repetition nor with the number of previous repetitions. In contrast, the P300 elicited by the same words were sensitive to both lag and recency of repetition, suggesting that they were influenced by the episodic memory strength of the items.

Language: en