Citation

Bergseth KJ, Bouffard JA. J. Crim. Justice 2007; 35(4): 433-451.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.05.006

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

While extant research generally supports restorative justice as an alternative to traditional juvenile court processing, much of this research is limited to short-term follow-up periods examining only prevalence of reoffense. In addition, recent meta-analyses point to several study design characteristics, the impacts of which are not well understood. This study compared long-term outcomes of youth referred to restorative justice and traditional juvenile court processing using multiple outcome measures. Specifically, the authors examined the impact of restorative justice referral on prevalence of reoffense, number of later official contacts, and seriousness of later offending behavior over several follow-up periods up to four years post-referral.