Citation

Gandhi S, Rovi SLD, Vega M, Johnson MS, Ferrante J, Chen PH. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2010; 23(3): 343-353.

Affiliation

Department of Family Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School, Newark.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, American Board of Family Medicine)

DOI

10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090124

PMID

20453180

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of intimate partner violence (IPV) with breast and cervical cancer screening rates. METHODS: We conducted retrospective chart audits of 382 adult women at 4 urban family medicine practices. Inclusion criteria were not being pregnant, no cancer history, and having a partner. Victims were defined as those who screened positive on at least one of 2 brief IPV screening tools: the HITS (Hurt, Insult, Threat, Scream) tool or Women Abuse Screening Tool (short). Logistic regression models were used to examine whether nonvictims, victims of emotional abuse, and victims of physical and/or sexual abuse were up to date for mammograms and Papanicolaou smears. RESULTS: Prevalence of IPV was 16.5%. Compared with victims of emotional abuse only, victims of physical and/or sexual abuse aged 40 to 74 were associated with 87% decreased odds of being up to date on Papanicolaou smears (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.86) and 84% decreased odds of being up to date in mammography (odds ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.99). There was no difference in Papanicolaou smear rates among female victims and nonvictims younger than 40. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the high prevalence of IPV, screening is essential among all women. Clinicians should ensure that victims of physical and/or sexual abuse are screened for cervical cancer and breast cancer, particularly women aged 40 or older. Cancer screening promotion programs are needed for victims of abuse.

Language: en