SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kenner NM, Mumford JA, Hommer RE, Skup M, Leibenluft E, Poldrack RA. J. Neurosci. 2010; 30(25): 8512-8518.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1563, Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, Yale University Child Study Center, and Biostatistics Division in School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06529, Section on Bipolar Spectrum Disorders, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-2670, and Department of Neurobiology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Society for Neuroscience)

DOI

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1096-10.2010

PMID

20573898

PMCID

PMC2905623

Abstract

While much is known about the neural regions recruited in the human brain when a dominant motor response becomes inappropriate and must be stopped, less is known about the regions that support switching to a new, appropriate, response. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging with two variants of the stop-signal paradigm that require either stopping altogether or switching to a different response, we examined the brain systems involved in these two forms of executive control. Both stopping trials and switching trials showed common recruitment of the right inferior frontal gyrus, presupplementary motor area, and midbrain. Contrasting switching trials with stopping trials showed activation similar to that observed on response trials (where the initial response remains appropriate and no control is invoked), whereas there were no regions that showed significantly greater activity for stopping trials compared with switching trials. These results show that response switching can be supported by the same neural systems as response inhibition, and suggest that the same mechanism of rapid, nonselective response inhibition that is thought to support speeded response stopping can also support speeded response switching when paired with execution of the new, appropriate, response.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print